Double standard and Other Stuff

Double standard of pearls I think the proposal of a workshop to help integrate foreign immigrants Catalonia, presented by the Regional Minister Carme Capdevila. Who can be against a plan that allows a better root, provides tools for adaptation and learning to improve knowledge about the society they get there? No one, it might seem. Well it is not. An almost identical law that works and in Valencia, driven at the time by the Minister of PP Rafael Blasco, was voted against by the left that promotes itself in Catalonia. In what is seen, it is not important, then, what is proposed, but who does it. The PSOE PSPV-crossed retrograde Valencian law, interventionist and up front. What will he think now of that other, similar, approved by their counterparts in the Principality? The least we can think of at this double standard is that almost all politicians have few convictions and yes, however, many opportunities at the expense of taxpayers suffered. Poor Europe

A federal Europe would be a positive horizon for citizens: complicated by that of its 23 official languages, but desirable. Europeans only perceive, however, so droll news as the standard adopted by the EU on the comfort of the chickens, which cost the Spanish poultry sector 1,000 million euros. That, and the feeling that politicians in Brussels bivouacked with more past than future, raises skepticism and voter turnout, but not for a lack of candidates: 35 games, some so bizarre as bullfighting, aspire to a seat. Yet, we still know our representatives and ignore what they do. This promotes what some parties interested in resolving domestic disputes in this election than doing more Europe. But the sin of his folly bear the penance of public disaffection. So do not complain later if people stay at home or, worse, is released by a slope undemocratic. POL? TICOS SUICIDE bombers are like those motorists driving in the opposite direction and play their lives and those of others. I mean our politicians, poor them. Instead of conducting an orderly and constructive proposals to excite the staff, they spend all their artillery dialectic to mess with the opponent and bring up topics such as Gürtel, abortion, Barcenas, Falcon, unemployment, Chaves, flu, Fabra ... It seems, therefore, they care so much that Europe wins the election next Sunday, as it loses the rival party.

In their blindness, know that with this destructive tactic at the end we all lose: citizens, who are left not knowing what alternatives Athens, Europe, the danger of weakening bled to abstain, and ultimately themselves, which show not to be to rise to the occasion. If our politicians behave, then, as suicidal drivers, why are we letting them take the wheel?